106 results for 'nos:"Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury"'.
J. Volk grants the government's motion for summary judgment in 27 former Beckley Veterans Medical Center patients' suits claiming they contracted infectious diseases from the uncredentialed use of acupuncture by Dr. Jonathan Yates. The 27 patients' claims are barred by res judicata since they all previously filed suits against Yates for malpractice and, prior to the government filing responsive pleadings, signed releases from any claims arising from Yates' medical negligence including those "unknown" or "unsuspected."
Court: USDC Southern District of West Virginia, Judge: Volk, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv243, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Government, Health Care, Medical Malpractice
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Reidinger denies a man, who was involuntarily committed to a hospital in 2016, his motion for reconsideration after he previously filed two other civil actions that were denied. The man then filed a motion to reverse the denials, but these were time-barred. The present motion for reconsideration is therefore futile.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Reidinger, Filed On: April 1, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv305, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Civil Procedure, Constitution, Medical Malpractice
J. Nardacci denies in part a motion for summary judgment in a wrongful death medical malpractice suit against a federally funded healthcare provider, finding the family estate’s expert witness, a cardiologist, is qualified to provide testimony regarding the decedent’s cause of death. The decedent died from a heart attack brought on by a rare heart condition shortly after he was taken off Clozaril, a medication to treat his mental health condition. However, three of the four healthcare personnel named in the suit are dismissed due to a lack of expert testimony implicating them in decedent’s death.
Court: USDC Northern District of New York, Judge: Nardacci, Filed On: March 29, 2024, Case #: 1:20cv574, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Experts, Wrongful Death, Medical Malpractice
J. Davis denies the government's motion for summary judgment in the deceased Vietnam veteran's wife's medical-malpractice suit on her husband's behalf, and denies the wife's motion for leave to file a motion to strike the government's expert physicians' surrebuttal declarations. The wife has exhausted her administrative remedies, since the Veteran's Administration took nearly two years to issue a decision on her claim, and did so after this litigation began. Additionally, questions of fact remain as to whether the wife can establish that the Veterans Administration's failure to dialyze the veteran led to his cardiac arrest. Finally, a prior order in this case did not bar admission of the expert surrebuttals.
Court: USDC Minnesota, Judge: Davis, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 0:21cv1431, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Experts, Medical Malpractice
J. Norton grants the cancer patient's motion for reconsideration. The court awarded summary judgment to the military doctor and government as to the patient's claims the doctor forged his signature on a form consenting to having his prostatectomy performed by a less-skilled surgeon. The patient incurred complications after surgery requiring further medical intervention. A motion in limine has been filed requesting to name a handwriting expert as a witness, and the government has also submitted new evidence. The evidence now is meaningfully different from that before the court on the motions for summary judgment.
Court: USDC South Carolina Aiken, Judge: Norton, Filed On: March 25, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv3801, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Evidence, Government, Medical Malpractice
J. Biery adopts a report and recommendations and dismisses, with prejudice, a medical malpractice suit brought against an Army hospital under the Federal Torts Claim Act because the pro se patient has failed to timely respond to court motions and did not properly serve the Army hospital despite an order from a judge explaining how to do so.
Court: USDC Western District of Texas , Judge: Biery, Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv307, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Government, Tort, Medical Malpractice
J. Dimke dismisses the family member's complaint alleging that the hospital and others prescribed pain medication to the decedent, contributing to her addiction and her eventual death from “the toxic effects of multiple drugs.” The family member does not establish a proper basis for this court to exercise personal jurisdiction over the hospital, because although the hospital and others transmitted prescriptions to Washington pharmacies, the family member does not cite any authority supporting their argument that a prescription transmission to an out-of-state pharmacy at the patient's request is enough to show a purposeful direction.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Washington, Judge: Dimke, Filed On: March 14, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv31, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Jurisdiction, Medical Malpractice
J. Urias denies the doctor's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that because she owns property and registered her medical license in Maryland, diversity requirements are met and this court has jurisdiction over the estate's medical malpractice claims. Meanwhile, the federal government's motion to dismiss will also be denied to allow for limited discovery on the issue of whether the doctor was an independent contractor that would render her an employee of the U.S.
Court: USDC New Mexico, Judge: Urias, Filed On: March 6, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv188, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Government, Jurisdiction, Medical Malpractice
J. Crabtree rules an estate administrator may pursue wrongful death claims against a nursing home. The estate administrator sufficiently showed in court that nursing home employees failed to prevent her father from walking without assistance, falling, and suffering fatal injuries.
Court: USDC Kansas, Judge: Crabtree, Filed On: March 6, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv2385, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Health Care, Negligence, Wrongful Death
J. Wood adopts the magistrate judge's recommendation and grants the healthcare provider's and doctor's motion to dismiss the couple's medical malpractice action as a sanction for fabricating evidence. The action arose from injuries the husband allegedly suffered after a doctor left gauze inside his nasal cavity following a septoplasty. The couple's objections to the magistrate judge's findings, including that a cell phone video taken by the husband showing bloody materials in a basin after his doctor's appointment was fabricated, are overruled. The couple "abused the judicial process and committed a fraud upon the court" by staging the video with fake, bloody items and submitting it to the provider and doctor during discovery as a "centerpiece" of their case. The provider and doctor proved the husband did not record the video in a specific exam room.
Court: USDC Southern District of Georgia, Judge: Wood, Filed On: March 1, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv21, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Sanctions, Medical Malpractice
J. Mendez-Miro grants the hospital and doctors' motion to exclude the testimony of one expert, but denies their motion to exclude another's testimony and a supplement to a motion in limine. The first expert, a neurologist, came to broad conclusions about the standard of care that do not rest on reliable scientific methodologies or grounds. The hospital and doctors' contentions that the second, testifying as a Life Care Planner, engaged in unsupported speculation are not sufficient reason to exclude his testimony. The supplement, finally, does not include any new theories or evidence surprising to the hospital or doctors, and is harmless.
Court: USDC Puerto Rico, Judge: Mendez-Miro, Filed On: February 23, 2024, Case #: 3:20cv1431, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Experts, Medical Malpractice
J. Lanza grants the Department of Veterans Affairs' motion for summary judgment concerning Federal Tort claims brought by the widow of a U.S. army veteran, now deceased, who suffered post trauma while serving his country in Iraq. The Department of Veterans Affairs sufficiently showed in court that a nurse that treated him at the VA clinic was not responsible for his death by suicide based on a negative screen for a suicide risk and low depression scale assessments.
Court: USDC Arizona, Judge: Lanza, Filed On: February 22, 2024, Case #: 2:20cv2275, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Health Care, Tort, Negligence
J. Burkhardt denies the government's motion to compel the patient, who claims that the Department of Veterans Affairs' failure to diagnose and treat a retinal tear in his left eye left him with permanent injuries, to undergo a mental health exam. The government has failed to meet its burden to show that the patient placed his mental condition in controversy. The amount of emotional distress damages the patient seeks does not, by itself, justify a court-ordered mental health examination.
Court: USDC Southern District of California, Judge: Burkhardt, Filed On: February 2, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv1026, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Emotional Distress, Discovery, Medical Malpractice